The Days Ahead: Trade and more trade. Unemployment numbers.
One-Minute Summary: We're away but not absent. Off on a short recharge break. Back in two weeks. While we’re gone, this is what we’ll be paying attention to:
1. Trade Talks. China, Canada and Europe. We'd look for a de-escalation with China and some progress with the EU. There’s a sort of “good cop (Treasury), bad cop (Commerce)” play going on and Treasury is up first. We'd also look for Canada to be included in the “just don't call it NAFTA” discussions. There seems to be some urgency going into the midterms to get something done.
2. Growth. We talked about some so-so housing numbers last week but Industrial Production keeps chugging along. The Q2 GDP revised numbers came out. They went up a bit from 4.1% to 4.2%. You can see from the graph what a rapid departure Q2 was from prior quarters (blue bars):
The big question is, how much is growth borrowed from the future? We'd say at least 0.5% but admit this is a very rough estimate and we’re not economists. Take a look at the second line. That’s GDI (Gross Domestic Income) and is an alternative way to measure GDP. They should be the same but there is a very big discrepancy right now. In the second quarter, investments in “Intellectual Property” were revised up by a whopping 2.8%. That’s basically software. But personal consumption and imports were revised down.
The theory behind the tax cut is that companies’ lower tax bills lead to increased profits, which mean more investment, which grow employment and wages. The first one is happening. Pre-tax corporate profits were up 7% YOY and post-tax up 17% (these are national numbers…. S&P 500 companies are way ahead). Investment growth slowed and the personal side is back to where it was a year ago.
So far the consensus is for another 3.5% GDP growth Q3 but the latest trade numbers were not great and are set to be a net drag in Q3.
3. Employment and the Fed: First Friday in the month so jobs numbers next week. We would expect around 180,000 but given the margin of error on this number, +/- 40,000 would not make much difference to the market. Hourly earnings will also be mostly unchanged at 2.5% but down and close to zero in real terms. The Fed doesn't meet until September 26, at which time they’ll almost certainly raise the Fed Funds rate by 25bp to 2.25%.
Meanwhile, we’d expect 10-Year Treasuries to trade around 2.8% to 3.0%.
4. Stock market breadth: We've seen some improvement in the advance/decline ratio. What we look for is wide participation in the market. A “bad” participation day would be if a few stocks are enough to push the index up but the majority of stocks fall. Recently it’s been about half the stocks up and half down on an upday, which is good.
5. Emerging Markets. Markets bounced 4% this week, based on the Mexico trade deal and a weaker dollar. The big three influences are at work: trade, rates and the dollar. None of those will disappear overnight. But we’d look for some relief on the currency side. And on Emerging Markets….
6. We had an interesting question come up in our Emerging Markets call-in (it’s here)
Is the term “Emerging" accurate? Or are the so-called "emerging markets" comparable to the time-honored description of Argentina, i.e., "has a great future and always will have?"
The Argentina reference comes from the fact that at the turn of the 20th century, Argentina was the world’s 10th largest economy. Now it's not even in the top 20.
We don't think the term “Emerging” is terribly helpful. It was 40 years ago but when you have the second largest economy (China) and South Korea or Taiwan all called “Emerging” there is a definitional problem. Just to confuse things further, Argentina is Emerging with some index providers and “Frontier” for others. Same goes for South Korea. Some say “Developed,” others “Emerging” and the differences are down to the Chaebols, not to South Korea’s heft in the world economy.
The “Emerging” definition these days is as much about governance as economic size. So countries with restrictions on foreign ownership, non-GAAP reporting standards, cross-holdings or voting shares are all in the Emerging bucket. When they start to address those they're promoted into Developed.
There are some real powerhouses in emerging markets: China, South Korea, Taiwan and India. They're 65% of the index. And even eastern European countries (12%) are pretty advanced these days.
We don't think there are many that are perennial hopefuls (i.e. probably not going to do much in coming years) and not one of those countries is more than 2% of the index. Here’s what it looks like:
So, yes, while “Emerging” has a nice ring to it, “Less developed” is probably more accurate.
7. And finally: In a month when we hit several all-time highs, we’d remind ourselves of the long term. Here’s the Dow Jones stock index back to 1900 (the S&P 500 is a better index but only goes back to the 1950s). Through some bad times, the market has powered ahead. On the 10th anniversary of the Lehman crash, it’s worth looking at how well the market has done over time.
As always, if something comes up please feel free to call Rita on 415 435 8330.
Bottom Line: Stocks are trending up but with no big stories or conviction but on macro and political headlines.
Please check out our 119 Years of the Dow chart
Subscribe here for our investment updates
Five lessons from the ultimate innovators
--Christian Thwaites, Brouwer & Janachowski, LLC
Please note that this discussion of our investments and investment strategy (including our research and investment process) represents our investments and investment strategy at the date of this commentary, and is subject to change without notice. We cannot assure that the type of investments discussed in this commentary will outperform any other investment strategy in the future, nor can we guarantee that such investments will present the best or an attractive risk-adjusted investment in the future. This is for general informational purposes only; references to an individual security should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The securities mentioned in this commentary are only several of the successful as well as unsuccessful investments by us, and do not represent all of the securities we have purchased, sold or recommended. Although we deem reliable the sources of the statistical and other information referred to in this commentary, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or numerical data. Past performance is no indication of future results.
All charts from Factset unless otherwise noted.