The Days Ahead: More fallout from Irma and Harvey
Markets were keyed into the Florida hurricane. We already saw a big jump in jobless claims last week from 236,000 to 298,000. That’s only one week of Harvey. Katrina pushed up claims by 100,000 back in 2005 and Houston and Florida have twenty times the population of New Orleans. It will be difficult, in the next few months, to get a read on the data and the underlying trends.
Elsewhere, the ECB left rates unchanged. They're on a different track from the Fed. They are still buying bonds at the rate of Euro 60bn a month but beginning to run out of eligible bonds. It’s likely they'll follow the path of i) tapering ii) reducing the balance sheet and then iii) raise rates. The Fed went i) taper ii) raise rates and is about to iii) reduce the balance sheet. President Draghi also mentioned some concerns in commercial real estate. Which we’re watching.
And the Fed lost its Vice Chair: Stanley Fischer This is a very big deal. For a start, it means there will be three board members and four vacancies, which is probably a record. It also means the Regional Presidents are now in the majority of the FOMC and the size of the FOMC, which should be 12, is now eight. We still have no read on the next Fed Chair. We’re hopeful Yellen will re-up or at least stay on as a non-Chair. But precedent is against us.
1. Growth and Value: It should be easy. Growth stocks have a record of, er, growth, high multiples and increasing sales. Value stocks are cheap relative to their book value, generate lots of cash and sell below market levels. So, a Value Index tilts towards Financials, Energy and some Health Care (the basic stuff like supplies and long term treatments). Those three sectors alone account for over 55% of the Value index. They should be attractive as core long-term holdings and a solid investment. But not so:
Over three years, Growth outperformed Value by 22%. Is this end point dependent? Well, for five years Growth was better by 25%, 10 years by 60% and by even larger amounts over 20 and 30 years. The time when Value really paid off was in the 2000s after the tech bust. In the five years to 2007, Value outperformed by 20%.
What’s going on? One problem is financials. They may trade at a discount to book value but determining the actual value of bank assets, as opposed to the published value, can be tricky. Are all those loans good? Should we discount the Deferred Tax Asset? After all tax rates may fall and is that really an “asset”? It certainly wouldn't be if you applied for a mortgage. Are those lease assets (say, putting your bank branches into a lease agreement), really worth what they say they are? Will regulatory change help or hurt earnings? If these are all uncertain, then the stocks may trade at a permanent discount to book value, and then you have a classic “Value Trap.”
On the other side, in a period of low growth, Growth stocks sell at a premium. This is especially true when many growth stocks are effectively monopoly platforms and there simply aren’t that many growth stories around. That seems to be the case today.
Should we give up on Value? No. We like companies that throw off a lot of free cash flow. This avoids i) highly leveraged companies (debt tends to do a number on cash flow) and ii) manipulated GAAP accounting that allows deferred sales or high warranty costs. Berkshire Hathaway is a great example of avoiding both. And it has the added benefit of some strong businesses that are valued at cost, sometimes from years ago, and with goodwill mostly written off. We also like companies with strong balance sheets and cash generation. But, in general, we’re not big fans of “pure value” and can't really see a catalyst for change (h/t John Authers.)
2. Debt Ceiling (again): We posted this chart earlier in the week. But things changed. It shows the spread between 1-Month and 3-Month Treasury bills. It should be a spread of around 6bps but look at this:
For a while in the week, 1-Month bills yielded more than 3-Month bills and briefly yielded more than 2-Year Notes. The explanation is easy. The expiration of the debt ceiling fell smack in the middle of when the 1-Month bills matured. So, why take the risk? Investors went for longer dated maturities on the basis that those would be less likely to delay principal payments.
We know now that the debt ceiling problem has been well and truly kicked down the road until December. Which is good. Except that coincides with the FOMC meeting on December 12th, which is the probable time of a rate increase. It’s never good to see money markets twitchy. They’re the backbone of the payments system. So, last week was both a reprieve and a heightening of the problem.
3. The Lucky Country: Meanwhile Australia has just recorded its 26th straight year without a recession. Australia is around 7% of the MSCI-EAFE index, the leading large cap tracker of non-U.S. stocks, and 20% of Pacific stock markets. One tends to think of Australia as a resource economy. They're about 5% of GDP. Exports are around 18% of GDP and GDP per capita around the same as the U.S. Here's the chart:
The top part shows GDP growing consistently with only the occasional quarter of negative growth (it generally takes two consecutive quarters to record a recession). Even 2008-2009 barely dented growth. The line shows declining unemployment.
How do they do it? Well, part of it is immigration. The lower chart shows growth of the labor force overlaid with that of the U.S. As is clear, the number of workers entering the workforce has far exceeded that of the U.S. Average growth is 1.7% compared to the U.S. of 0.8%. At that rate the population doubles in 40 years, compared to the U.S. of 90 years. So, it would seem if you want to keep growth up, you need healthy population growth. Either by birth rate or immigration. Mmmm.
There are other factors contributing to the Australia success story. Low interest rates, a strong housing market and household debt growth. Sure, a drop in mining and metals will hurt but that seems not to be in the cards. The biggest industry in the stock market is financials, which tend to be solid GDP trackers and benefit from industrial and housing growth. There are other reasons we like Asia as an investment opportunity. But for now Australia’s winning streak looks set to continue.
Bottom Line: Stocks have gone sideways for most of the quarter. The 10-Year Treasury yield, on the other hand, has dropped from 2.4% to 2.06%, for a return of more than 3%. We expect stocks to stay well bid. If nothing else, the weak dollar (down 12% this year) and foreign growth path will help large companies.
Please check out our 118 Years of the Dow chart
Subscribe here for our investment updates
Moody’s on South Korea
Blankfein on Cohn: “He’s not that bright but should be OK for the Fed”
--Christian Thwaites, Brouwer & Janachowski, LLC
Please note that this discussion of our investments and investment strategy (including our research and investment process) represents our investments and investment strategy at the date of this commentary, and is subject to change without notice. We cannot assure that the type of investments discussed in this commentary will outperform any other investment strategy in the future, nor can we guarantee that such investments will present the best or an attractive risk-adjusted investment in the future. This is for general informational purposes only; references to an individual security should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The securities mentioned in this commentary are only several of the successful as well as unsuccessful investments by us, and do not represent all of the securities we have purchased, sold or recommended. Although we deem reliable the sources of the statistical and other information referred to in this commentary, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or numerical data. Past performance is no indication of future results.
All charts from Factset unless otherwise noted.